Action intentions modulate allocation of visual attention: electrophysiological evidence.

Front Psychol · 2012 · PMC3464057 · PMID 23060841

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Finally, planned comparisons between grasping and pointing conditions for size and luminance tasks separately (target present trials) revealed that the difference between those two conditions was significant in the luminance task, t (13) = 2.1, p < 0.05 (one-tailed) and marginally significant in the size task, t (13) = 2.1, p = 0.06 (one-tailed).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.