Forgetting what was where: the fragility of object-location binding.

PLoS One · 2012 · PMC3485137 · PMID 23118956

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0200

closest p · 0.4× alpha

0.0200

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp = .02actually significant

Planned comparisons revealed highly significant differences between the actual and predicted values (for 2 objects: t(25) = 2.6, p = .02, g = 0.46; for 3 objects: t(25) = 2.1, p = .05, g = 0.55; for 4 objects: t(25) = 6.9, p<.0001, g = 1.05; for 5 objects: t(25) = 7.4, p<.0001, g = 1.45).

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.