Children's and adults' on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences during reading.

However, there was an effect of attachment on the number of first pass regressions made out of the post-target region reliable by participants and very close to significance by items F 1(1, 52) = 7.22, p <.05, η 2 = .12; F 2(1, 15) = 4.10, p = .06, η 2 = .21.

also in 95 other papers

In addition, Experiment 2 revealed more enduring disruption to processing for younger children following their initial syntactic misanalysis: younger children showed a reliable effect of closure in total reading times in the post-target region while older children and adults did not (although older children showed a numerical trend).

also in 723 other papers