Space-valence priming with subliminal and supraliminal words.

This ANOVA confirmed the significant main effects of congruence, F (1, 38) = 90.87, p < 0.01, partial η 2 = 0.71, and an almost significant effect of prime type, F (1, 38) = 3.79, p = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.09, as well as the important interactions between (1) congruence and prime type, F (1, 38) = 23.21, p < 0.01, partial η 2 = 0.38, (2) congruence and prime visibility, F (1, 38) = 5.34, p < 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.12, and (3) congruence, prime type, and prime visibility, F (1, 38) = 4.62, p < 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.11.

also in 1,858 other papers

There was also a trivial main effect of the variable quintile, F (4, 156) = 270.59, p < 0.01, partial η 2 = 0.87 (ε = 0.26), and the variable quintile also interacted significantly with congruence, F (4, 156) = 6.97, p < 0.01, partial η 2 = 0.15 (ε = 0.51), with prime type, F (4, 156) = 5.80, p < 0.01, partial η 2 = 0.13 (ε = 0.45), and in a marginally significant three-way interaction with congruence and prime type, F (4, 156) = 3.02, p = 0.07, partial η 2 = 0.07 (ε = 0.38).

also in 26,082 other papers

Figure 3 also indicates that a four-way interaction between congruence, prime type, visibility, and quintile should have obtained – basically because the absence of the congruence effect with masked valence primes only – but this interaction fell short of significance, F (4, 152) = 2.10, p = 0.08, partial η 2 = 0.05.

also in 361 other papers