marginally non-significantp = 0.056
3 ; Table 2 ), while OS showed a marginally non-significant trend (F 1,308 = 3.68; p = 0.056; Table 2 ).
3 ; Table 2 ), while OS showed a marginally non-significant trend (F 1,308 = 3.68; p = 0.056; Table 2 ).
FA was highly significant for all traits, and levels of within-side measurement error were consistently low compared to between-side differences (repeatability: 0.69< all ICC <0.93; Table 1 ).