Semantic classical conditioning and brain-computer interface control: encoding of affirmative and negative thinking.

Front Neurosci · 2013 · PMC3590492 · PMID 23471568

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0550

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0590

boldest claim

The sentences

borderline significantp = 0.055so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

In Group 2 of Exp II a borderline significant effect of CS Type was found [ F (1.09, 5.47) = 5.82, p = 0.055, partial η 2 = 0.54].

also in 11,409 other papers

borderline significancep = 0.059so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The contrasts revealed a significantly higher AUC value for segments during “yes” thinking compared to the baseline ( p < 0.05) and a borderline significance compared to segments of “no” thinking ( p = 0.059).

also in 7,017 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.