marginally significantP = 0.06
A marginally significant effect of CONDITION was observed [ F (1, 32) = 3.9, P = 0.06], but no effect of GROUP [ F (1, 32) = 1.8, P = 0.19] and no interactions between these factors (all P ≥ 0.09) were noted.
A marginally significant effect of CONDITION was observed [ F (1, 32) = 3.9, P = 0.06], but no effect of GROUP [ F (1, 32) = 1.8, P = 0.19] and no interactions between these factors (all P ≥ 0.09) were noted.
Replicating previous findings, we noted a strong and highly significant improvement of detection performance in the BLANK compared to the STEP task for both saccade directions in healthy individuals (Deubel et al., 1996 ).