iPad-assisted measurements of duration estimation in psychiatric patients and healthy control subjects.

PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3642147 · PMID 23658689

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp = .001actually significant

T-tests revealed that the differences in the absolute relative errors were highly significant; specifically, the psychiatric patients misestimated timespans, whereas the healthy control subjects produced rather accurate time estimates ( t (152) = 3.28, p = .001).

also in 132,142 other papers

failed to reach significancep = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Specific characteristics of duration estimates Further analysis failed to reveal significant gender differences in the time estimates; Overall, women demonstrated a higher relative error in time estimates, but the differences failed to reach significance ( M(re) _female_patients = 29.05, SD = 64.99; M(re) _male_patients = 7.12, SD = 53.07; t (102) = 1.81, p = .07, n.s. ).

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.