marginal significancep = 0.56
When this study was set aside, there was marginal significance with a conservative effect estimate of 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03–1.19, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.56).
When this study was set aside, there was marginal significance with a conservative effect estimate of 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03–1.19, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.56).
Similar patterns were observed in the analyses by HDI, with stronger, significant associations seen in lower resource settings for nutrition counseling (RR = 5.11, 95% CI: 2.95–8.87) and a trend towards significance for vaccinations (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.98–1.63).