highly significantp < 0.001
While the main effect of Condition was not significant ( F < 1, n.s .), the Game × Condition interaction was highly significant, F (1, 90) = 12.25, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.12 (see Figure 2 ).
While the main effect of Condition was not significant ( F < 1, n.s .), the Game × Condition interaction was highly significant, F (1, 90) = 12.25, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.12 (see Figure 2 ).
Consistent with previous results regarding the UG and the DG, we found a marginally significant main effect for the Game: F (1, 90) = 3.78, p = 0.055, η 2 p = 0.04, indicating that the proportion of equal split offers was higher for UG participants ( M = 70.0%, SD = 40.9) compared to DG participants ( M = 55.1%, SD = 45.9).