Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Confounding and missing data in cost-effectiveness analysis: comparing different methods.

Health Econ Rev · 2013 · PMC3695850 · PMID 23537421

1
hedged sentence
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantno p-value reported
The AUC differences for effectiveness were highly significant for the unadjusted bootstrapped difference (-0.38), but the adjusted mean -0.04 based on predictive margins was not significant and close to zero (P-values 0.000 and 0.566, respectively), whereas the predictive mean difference based on the Bayesian inference produced a much smaller difference of -0.03 with credible interval (CrI) (-0.27, 0.20) (Table 3 ).

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.