highly significantP = 2.1×10 -7
While saliva sample volume remained the variable with the largest effect (P = 6.8x10 -27 ), DNA turbidity and purity where highly significant at P = 2.1×10 -7 and P = 1.8×10 -4 , respectively.
While saliva sample volume remained the variable with the largest effect (P = 6.8x10 -27 ), DNA turbidity and purity where highly significant at P = 2.1×10 -7 and P = 1.8×10 -4 , respectively.
Interestingly, a borderline significant association (P = 0.058) was observed between age and saliva volume, suggesting that older subjects may have been more likely to provide a 0.5 mL sample, consistent with reports that xerostomia (dry mouth) prevalence increases with age [ 8 ].