marginally significantp = 0.095
Finally the Stimulation site * Humanness interaction was marginally significant ( F (1,19) = 3.09; p = 0.095), with a poorer accuracy for categorization of natural voice sounds in the larynx-stimulated group.
Finally the Stimulation site * Humanness interaction was marginally significant ( F (1,19) = 3.09; p = 0.095), with a poorer accuracy for categorization of natural voice sounds in the larynx-stimulated group.