An ERP study of the processing of common and decimal fractions: how different they are.

PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3722127 · PMID 23894491

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0590

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0590

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.059so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

On the mean amplitude of the P3, the condition effect was marginally significant at the central sites, F (1, 12) = 4.36, p = 0.059, with common fractions eliciting greater positivity than decimal fractions (5.63 μV vs. 4.83 μV).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.