marginally significantp = .05
When we collapsed across Choices 1 through 3, the difference between the control and stop groups was marginally significant ( p = .05).
When we collapsed across Choices 1 through 3, the difference between the control and stop groups was marginally significant ( p = .05).
There was a numerical trend for higher betting scores in the double-response group than in the control group, which would be consistent with a depletion account; however, the difference was not significant ( p = .29).