marginally significantP = 0.04
Similarly, when shark were excluded from the analysis, the Se-Hg:Se relationship for fish became marginally significant (F 1,8 = 5.7, P = 0.04) and Se content explained 41% of the variation in molar Hg:Se.
Similarly, when shark were excluded from the analysis, the Se-Hg:Se relationship for fish became marginally significant (F 1,8 = 5.7, P = 0.04) and Se content explained 41% of the variation in molar Hg:Se.