Time- and task-dependent non-neural effects of real and sham TMS.

PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3763998 · PMID 24040080

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < .001actually significant

In line this view, a repeated-measures ANOVA on reaction time during noTMS trials with task (detection, angle judgment), TMS type (sham, real), and context (interleaved, blocked) as within subject factors revealed a highly significant effect of context ( F (1,13) = 59.940, p < .001) and an effect of task ( F (1,13) = 379.706, p < .001) due to differences in task difficulty.

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp = .060so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

No significant differences were observed for all remaining TMS time windows (all p > .15) but there was a marginally significant effect at +400 ms ( t (13) = 2.057, p = .060).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.