borderline significantp = 0.050
There was a borderline significant effect of IAT [ F (2, 60) = 3.141, p = 0.050], because of the slightly larger D score in IAT 3, described above.
There was a borderline significant effect of IAT [ F (2, 60) = 3.141, p = 0.050], because of the slightly larger D score in IAT 3, described above.
In IAT 3, there was a marginally significant effect in the expected direction, suggesting that participant's associate triangle with yellow and square with red, as Kandinsky would have predicted.