almost significantp =0.09
The primary outcome was percent change in wound area, and despite the small sample size, the results were almost significant (wound area reduction 31% vs. 4%, p =0.09) ( 56 ).
The primary outcome was percent change in wound area, and despite the small sample size, the results were almost significant (wound area reduction 31% vs. 4%, p =0.09) ( 56 ).