marginally significantp = 0.054
The interaction between direction and congruency was marginally significant in accuracy, F (1, 15) = 4.37, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.23 (Figure 4C ), while no interaction was found in RT (Figure 4D ).
The interaction between direction and congruency was marginally significant in accuracy, F (1, 15) = 4.37, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.23 (Figure 4C ), while no interaction was found in RT (Figure 4D ).
Controls were faster on visual trials ( M = 878.05 ms, SD = 127.52) than auditory trials ( M = 920.28 ms, SD = 145.61), but this difference failed to reach significance in RT.