Left radial access is preferable to right radial access for the diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures: a meta-analysis involving 22 randomized clinical trials and 10287 patients.

PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3818350 · PMID 24223815

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0370

closest p · 0.7× alpha

0.0900

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantP = 0.037actually significant

Relative to the right radial access, a marginally significant increase in catheter numbers was observed in the left radial access in studies with diagnostic coronary procedure only (WMD: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.63; P = 0.037), with strong evidence of heterogeneity (P<0.0005).

also in 26,082 other papers

an obvious trendP = 0.09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

In addition, there was an obvious trend of reduction in fluoroscopy time (WMD: –59.7; 95% CI: –128.64 to 9.3; P = 0.09) in studies with interventional coronary procedure, although no significance was reached, possibly due to the small sample sizes involved, and the heterogeneity between trials was absent (P = 0.264).

also in 1,006 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.