marginally nonsignificantP = 0.068
This result could be explained by the marginally nonsignificant negative relationship of litter size and mean pup body mass (LM, F 1, 25 = 3.634, β = −0.264, SE = 0.131, N = 27, P = 0.068).
This result could be explained by the marginally nonsignificant negative relationship of litter size and mean pup body mass (LM, F 1, 25 = 3.634, β = −0.264, SE = 0.131, N = 27, P = 0.068).