marginally significantP = 0.111
Interestingly, unlike the RT analysis, the interaction between group and task type was marginally significant: F (1, 2) = 2.681, P = 0.111, η 2 = 0.073.
Interestingly, unlike the RT analysis, the interaction between group and task type was marginally significant: F (1, 2) = 2.681, P = 0.111, η 2 = 0.073.