Common neural mechanisms underlying reversal learning by reward and punishment.

PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3859585 · PMID 24349211

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.1000

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

punishment) and repetitions (rep 2 to 5) was marginally significant for RT (f(3,138) = 2.38, p = 0.07), but not significant for accuracy (f(3,138) = 0.58, p = .62).

also in 26,082 other papers

a small trendp = .10so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Only a small trend of feedback type by reversal interaction were found in the left (F(1,46) = 2.70, p = .10) and the right (F(1,46) = 2.98, p = .09) caudate, providing weak evidence for the specificity of caudate in punishment reversal learning.

also in 722 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.