almost significantp = 0.06
Separate ANOVAs for each task indicated that the interaction between Efficiency and RM was almost significant in the WM task ( t = −1.9, p = 0.06) but not in the CRT task ( t = 0.21, p > 0.8).
Separate ANOVAs for each task indicated that the interaction between Efficiency and RM was almost significant in the WM task ( t = −1.9, p = 0.06) but not in the CRT task ( t = 0.21, p > 0.8).