Evaluation of different approaches for using a laser scanner in digitization of dental impressions.

J Adv Prosthodont · 2014 · PMC3942523 · PMID 24605202

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0010

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP <.001actually significant

Difference between two framework fabrication methods were highly significant ( P <.001); Gap of working model showed significantly smaller gap compare to impression in MG, CG, and AOTG.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.