Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.

PLoS One · 2014 · PMC3954732 · PMID 24632841

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0100

closest p · 0.2× alpha

0.0530

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp<0.01actually significant

Most importantly, there was a highly significant interaction between pre-exposure frequency and visit type (F(6,164) = 5.4; p<0.01).

also in 132,142 other papers

borderline significantp = 0.053so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

There was a significant difference between the level of nose-poking in safe and conditioned visits during the conditioning phase (3-way ANOVA on tone frequency x day x mouse, main effect of frequency F(1,178) = 931.82, p<0.01), and discrimination was borderline significant already on day 1 (F(1,16) = 4.35, p = 0.053).

also in 11,409 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.