Assessment of rhythmic entrainment at multiple timescales in dyslexia: evidence for disruption to syllable timing.

Hear Res · 2014 · PMC3969307 · PMID 23916752

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0100

closest p · 0.2× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.01actually significant

This time, Watson–Williams tests indicated that there was a highly significant difference between groups for iambic sentences ( F (1,36) = 7.7, p < 0.01), while the group difference for trochaic sentences just missed significance ( F (1,38) = 3.9, p = 0.055).

also in 132,142 other papers

just missed significancep = 0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The effect of Nursery Rhyme just missed significance ( F (3, 123) = 2.65, p = 0.052).

also in 165 other papers

almost significantp = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Dyslexic participants showed significantly non-uniform phase distributions for the trochaic sentences, and this measure was almost significant for the iambic sentences ( p = 0.07).

also in 1,858 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.