Comparison of performances of gene signatures for survival prediction For all signatures except Hypoxia, differences in DMFS between risk groups were highly significant (n = 912; Figure 1 B).
← all excerpts
Systematic assessment of prognostic gene signatures for breast cancer shows distinct influence of time and ER status.
2
—
—
The sentences
We observed borderline significant protective effects (HR < 1: higher risk scores had lower risks for distant metastasis) within the last time interval (>10 years) in the ER-negative group for Intrinsic (p = 0.044), 70-gene (p = 0.007), GGI (p = 0.017) and WR (p = 0.01).