Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Living on the edge: reconstructing the genetic history of the Finnish wolf population.

BMC Evol Biol · 2014 · PMC4033686 · PMID 24678616

2
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0590
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP < 0.001actually significant
Genetic differentiation based on haplotype frequencies (Φ ST ) was large (0.329–0.514) and highly significant ( P < 0.001) between the first (before 1920) and all other temporal groups (Table 2 ), but not in other pairwise comparisons.

also in 132,142 other papers

a decreasing trendP = 0.059so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The two neutrality tests were significant in temporal groups collected in 1960–1979 (for Tajima’s D P = 0.0013 and for Fu’s F S P = 0.011), whereas for the group collected in 1980–1993, Fu’s test value F S was significant ( P = 0.006), but Tajima’s D showed a decreasing trend ( P = 0.059).

also in 47,180 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.