highly significantp < 0.003
Crucially, the interaction was highly significant [ F 1 (1, 10) = 15.63, MSE = 0.065, p < 0.003; F 2 (1, 30) = 9.28, MSE = 0.075, p < 0.005] 7 .
Crucially, the interaction was highly significant [ F 1 (1, 10) = 15.63, MSE = 0.065, p < 0.003; F 2 (1, 30) = 9.28, MSE = 0.075, p < 0.005] 7 .
The analyses yielded a significant main effect of lexicality [ F 1 (1, 10) = 8.10, MSE = 0.058, p < 0.02; F 2 (1, 30) = 5.48, MSE = 0.167, p < 0.03] and a marginally significant effect of reduplication [ F 1 (1, 10) = 2.97, MSE = 0.027, p < 0.12; F 2 (1, 30) = 3.11, MSE = 0.07, p < 0.09].