A direct comparison of unconscious face processing under masking and interocular suppression.

Front Psychol · 2014 · PMC4083827 · PMID 25071634

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.1300

closest p · 2.6× alpha

0.1300

boldest claim

The sentences

fell short of significancep = 0.13not close (p > 0.1)

We expected this similarity to potentially drive repetition priming under IS, which fell short of significance at the lowest mask contrast ( p = 0.13).

also in 361 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.