highly significantp<0.01
An analysis of variance with “type of VFD” (RHH versus scotoma) and “VFD present/absent” revealed a highly significant main effect of the simulated VFD (present vs. absent; F (1, 7) = 15.1, p<0.01).
An analysis of variance with “type of VFD” (RHH versus scotoma) and “VFD present/absent” revealed a highly significant main effect of the simulated VFD (present vs. absent; F (1, 7) = 15.1, p<0.01).
DN's fixation durations were shorter than the controls' with a marginally significant result (t = 1.6, p = 0.07).