marginally significantp = 0 .08
For 1:1 mappings in the first familiarization, we found a marginally significant positive correlation ( R = 0.225, p = 0 .08, N = 60) between accuracy and confidence ratings.
For 1:1 mappings in the first familiarization, we found a marginally significant positive correlation ( R = 0.225, p = 0 .08, N = 60) between accuracy and confidence ratings.
There was a highly significant difference in performance between 1:1 mappings in the first familiarization ( M = 73.3%, SD = 18.0%) and second familiarization [ M = 47.9%, SD = 14.6%; F (1,119) = 74.4, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.38].