highly significantP = 0.002
Without this outlier, the interaction between TMS and Task was highly significant [ F (1,22) = 11.7, P = 0.002]; effective TMS slowed responses on the action task relative to the location task [ t (22) = 3.2, P = 0.004, Cohen's d = 0.65], with no such difference during sham stimulation [ t (22) = 0.9, P = 0.38, Cohen's d = 0.18].