highly significantp < .000005
There was a highly significant difference between the PA and SD patients on this measure, t (18) = 6.87, p < .000005, one-tailed.
There was a highly significant difference between the PA and SD patients on this measure, t (18) = 6.87, p < .000005, one-tailed.
Consistent with previous work, there was a marginally significant effect of regularity on PA reading accuracy ( Behrmann, Nelson, et al., 1998 ; Rapcsak & Beeson, 2004 ), but LARC errors were the least common error type for the PA patients ( Cumming et al., 2006 ; Patterson & Kay, 1982 ).