Comparative study of manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC) technique and direct smear technique (conventional) on fine-needle cytology/fine-needle aspiration cytology samples.

J Cytol · 2014 · PMC4159902 · PMID 25210235

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

—

closest p

—

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantno p-value reported

For background study, we applied standard error of proportion statistics to the data obtained.[ 5 ] In MLBC technique hemorrhage and necrosis was reduced as compared with the conventional technique, P value was obtained <0.05, which is highly significant [Figures 4 , 5 and Table 2 ].

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.