marginally significant−log 10 ( P ) = 5.64
Using the MLM method, we were only able to identify the marginally significant association for ZmCCT (−log 10 ( P ) = 5.64) and there were no strong signals in other genome regions ( Figure 2B ).
Using the MLM method, we were only able to identify the marginally significant association for ZmCCT (−log 10 ( P ) = 5.64) and there were no strong signals in other genome regions ( Figure 2B ).
Interestingly, some associations that differed in the width of the phenotype distribution but which had nearly identical trait means were found to be highly significant by the A-D test but not significant by MLM.