marginally significantp = 0.059
Pairwise comparisons of the two learning rates in each subgroup showed a significant difference between the two in the “Learning Charity” subgroup (t 6 = 8.53, p<0.0001) with greater learning rate for self than charity and a marginally significant difference between the two in the “Learning Self” subgroup (t 11 = −2.104, p = 0.059) with greater learning rate for charity than self.