The regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: extending the medical model.

J Law Biosci · 2014 · PMC4168724 · PMID 25243073

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

—

closest p

—

boldest claim

The sentences

might be significantno p-value reported

For example, adjudicating between purposes might be significant for determining the level of safety required: if the benefits of a device used for enhancement would typically be less than the benefits of the same device used for therapy, then it might be appropriate to require a lower level of risk in order for the device to be approved for its enhancement purpose.

also in 2,435 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.