highly significantp < 0.001
In addition, the difference in average accuracy before and after training was highly significant [ t (42) = 3.553, p < 0.001, two-sample t -test; Cohen’s d = 0.963] (Figure 2 ).
In addition, the difference in average accuracy before and after training was highly significant [ t (42) = 3.553, p < 0.001, two-sample t -test; Cohen’s d = 0.963] (Figure 2 ).