marginally significantp=0.056
Post-hoc tests revealed that this effect was significant for loss (t (45) =−2.7, p=0.01) and was marginally significant for reward (t (32.4) =−2.0, p=0.056).
Post-hoc tests revealed that this effect was significant for loss (t (45) =−2.7, p=0.01) and was marginally significant for reward (t (32.4) =−2.0, p=0.056).