The congruency sequence effect 3.0: a critical test of conflict adaptation.

PLoS One · 2014 · PMC4207697 · PMID 25340396

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0503

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0520

boldest claim

The sentences

almost reached significancep = .0503so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

In Experiment 2B, however, the interaction between Previous and Current Congruency almost reached significance, F (1,23) = 4.27, p = .0503, η 2 partial = .16.

also in 321 other papers

borderline significantp = .052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The PE analysis revealed a borderline significant main effect of Previous Congruency, F (1,18) = 4.33, p = .052, yet no significant main effect of Current Congruency, F (1,18) <1, ns , indicating that incongruent trials did not evoke more erroneous responses (M = 4.3%) than congruent trials (M = 3.9%).

also in 11,409 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.