A comparison of three electrophysiological methods for the assessment of disease status in a mild spinal muscular atrophy mouse model.

PLoS One · 2014 · PMC4210182 · PMID 25347197

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0450

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp<0.001actually significant

There was a highly significant group effect for EIM (F(12,130) = 44, p<0.001) and a similarly strongly significant group effect for CMAP (F (12,130) = 26, p<0.001) but a non-significant group effect for MUNE (F (12,130) = 0.31, p = 0.58,).

also in 132,142 other papers

borderline significantp = 0.045actually significant

Figure 2d, 2e and 2f show that there were borderline significant differences between the groups for both EIM (p = 0.045) and CMAP (p = 0.043); MUNE showed no significant difference between the groups.

also in 11,409 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.