Flexibility of representational states in working memory.

Front Hum Neurosci · 2014 · PMC4222142 · PMID 25414654

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0840

closest p · 1.7× alpha

0.0840

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.084so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The incongruency effect for an incidental cue in the second position was marginally significant ( t (19) = 1.8, p = 0.084, Figure 2B ).

also in 26,082 other papers

marginal significancep = 0.084so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

This occurred in conditions when an incidental cue was presented in the first position ( t (19) = 3.7, p = 0.001, Figure 2A ), or second position (marginal significance, t (19) = 1.8, p = 0.084, Figure 2B ) or when two cues of the same color were presented ( t (19) = 2.27, p = 0.035, Figure 2C ).

also in 5,069 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.