marginally significantp =.062
The increase in response to speech was marginally significant compared to rhesus ( t (23) = 1.96, p =.062) and human non-communicative non-speech vocalizations ( t (23) = 1.82, p =.081).
The increase in response to speech was marginally significant compared to rhesus ( t (23) = 1.96, p =.062) and human non-communicative non-speech vocalizations ( t (23) = 1.82, p =.081).