marginal significancep = 0.079
The compatibility effect in RT was larger with marginal significance when the preceding trial type was incompatible compared to compatible, t (19) = 1.860, p = 0.079, d = 0.299 ( Figure 3A ).
The compatibility effect in RT was larger with marginal significance when the preceding trial type was incompatible compared to compatible, t (19) = 1.860, p = 0.079, d = 0.299 ( Figure 3A ).