marginal significancep = 0.07
We tested the hypothesis that improved reasoning leads to improved answer selection, after controlling for assessment, and found marginal significance ( F (2,20) = 3.09, p = 0.07).
We tested the hypothesis that improved reasoning leads to improved answer selection, after controlling for assessment, and found marginal significance ( F (2,20) = 3.09, p = 0.07).
Looking at specific differences within this general hypothesis, we found a significant improvement in answer selection between groups who had correct reasoning versus those with incorrect reasoning ( t (20) = 2.28, p = 0.03), marginally significant improvement between correct versus mixed reasoning ( t (20) = 1.80, p = 0.09), and an insignificant difference between mixed versus incorrect reasoning ( t (20) = 0.64, p = 0.53).