The time course of protecting a visual memory representation from perceptual interference.

Front Hum Neurosci · 2014 · PMC4292553 · PMID 25628555

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0720

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0800

boldest claim

The sentences

close to significancep = 0.072so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

failed to reach significancep = 0.26not close (p > 0.1)

However, the interaction failed to reach significance at the short interval ( F = 1.350, p = 0.26) and was close to significance at the long interval ( F (1,23) = 3.553, p = 0.072).

also in 2,130 other papers

a weak trendp = 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Indeed, when we analyzed the data for each condition separately, we observed a substantial linear trend ( F (1,15) = 11.544, p = 0.004 for sd; F (1,15) = 12.165, p = 0.003 for mean deviation) for the cue/mask condition, but no such trend for the cue/no-mask baseline condition ( F = 0.764, p = 0.52 for sd; F = 0.041, p = 0.84 for mean deviation) and if anything a weak trend in the opposite direction for the no-cue/mask condition ( F = 3.45, p = 0.08 for sd; F = 3.464, p = 0.08 mean deviation).

also in 1,404 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.