Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.

PLoS One · 2015 · PMC4346396 · PMID 25730423

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0001

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0400

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.0001actually significant

This analysis confirmed the highly significant effect of Hearing-loss [F(1,38) = 30.1, p < 0.0001, ω 2 = 0.43].

also in 132,142 other papers

marginal significancep < 0.03actually significant

The Position factor reached marginal significance [F(1,23) = 5.61, p < 0.03, ω 2 = 0.17], reflecting the fact that OHI listeners were slightly more accurate in identifying coda consonants (51.5% correct) than onset consonants (49.9% correct).

also in 5,069 other papers

marginally significantp < 0.04actually significant

Regression analysis showed a small but marginally significant correlation between CaST thresholds and age [r = 0.38, t(21) = 1.88, p < 0.04].

also in 26,082 other papers

failed to reach significanceno p-value reported

When only Group A and B consonants were included in the ANOVA, the Hearing-loss x Consonant-Group interaction failed to reach significance.

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.